Pricing built around workflow scope, not fake seat math.
CEDX prices against operational complexity, system count, control requirements, and launch risk. That is more honest than pretending a high-trust workflow behaves like a generic SaaS rollout.
Workflow audit
Best for firms that know a workflow is expensive but need a defensible view of feasibility, ROI, sequencing, and risk before implementation.
Focused build
Best for one workflow that already has executive sponsorship and clear operational pain. This is the fastest path to a live system.
Operating program
Best for firms standardizing multiple adjacent workflows under one operating model instead of solving problems one queue at a time.
The fastest way to get a price is to name the workflow, not ask for a brochure.
CEDX will tell you directly whether the workflow is too small, too messy, or ready for a serious build.
Pricing questions buyers ask first
This page exists to remove ambiguity from the commercial model without pretending every workflow can be productized into the same package.
Do you publish fixed public pricing?
No. CEDX prices against workflow complexity, system count, control requirements, and launch scope. The pricing page is here to explain the commercial model, not pretend every implementation looks the same.
Do you start with a paid workflow audit?
Most serious engagements start with a paid audit because that is the fastest way to define scope, identify control requirements, and avoid building the wrong system.
Can one audit lead directly into implementation?
Yes. That is the normal path when the workflow is already prioritized internally and the audit confirms a clean build path.
Is CEDX better for one workflow or a platform rollout?
One workflow first. High-trust teams buy faster when the business case is concrete and the first release solves an expensive operating problem.
Scope the work from here
Most buyers move from pricing to trust, documentation, and the concrete shape of the workflow system.